1956 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1980 Volvo 265
To start off, 1980 Volvo 265 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Cadillac Eldorado (185 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 265. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 265. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 665 kg more than 1980 Volvo 265. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Cadillac Eldorado | 1980 Volvo 265 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | Eldorado | 265 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 2849 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 1420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2660 mm |
