1956 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Chevrolet Corvette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Chevrolet Corvette would be higher. At 4,341 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Chevrolet Corvette. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Chevrolet Corvette | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Corvette | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4341 cc | 3724 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 273 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2880 mm |