1956 Chrysler C vs. 2002 Toyota ES 3
To start off, 2002 Toyota ES 3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Chrysler C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Chrysler C would be higher. At 5,801 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Chrysler C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Chrysler C weights approximately 1180 kg more than 2002 Toyota ES 3.
Because 1956 Chrysler C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Chrysler C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota ES 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Chrysler C | 2002 Toyota ES 3 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
| Model | C | ES 3 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5801 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5570 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2320 mm |
