1956 Chrysler C vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Chrysler C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Chrysler C would be higher. At 5,801 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Chrysler C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Chrysler C (335 HP) has 265 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Chrysler C should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Chrysler C weights approximately 1136 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Chrysler C (530 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 428 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1956 Chrysler C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.

Compare all specifications: