1956 Chrysler C vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Chrysler C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Chrysler C would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Chrysler C (350 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2010 Holden Calais. (344 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Chrysler C should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Calais.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Chrysler C (560 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Calais. (530 Nm). This means 1956 Chrysler C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Calais.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Chrysler C | 2010 Holden Calais | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | C | Calais |
Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5801 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 344 HP |
Torque | 560 Nm | 530 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |