1956 Chrysler C vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Chrysler C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Chrysler C would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1956 Chrysler C. (350 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1956 Chrysler C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Chrysler C (560 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden UTE. (530 Nm). This means 1956 Chrysler C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Chrysler C | 2012 Holden UTE | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | C | UTE |
Year Released | 1956 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5801 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 560 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |