1956 Chrysler C vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Chrysler C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Chrysler C would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Chrysler C weights approximately 1040 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Chrysler C (530 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 438 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1956 Chrysler C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Chrysler C | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Chrysler | Smart |
| Model | C | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 530 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5570 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 1867 mm |
