1956 Chrysler Imperial vs. 1995 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1995 Ford Ranger is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Chrysler Imperial. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Chrysler Imperial would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Chrysler Imperial is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Chrysler Imperial (247 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1995 Ford Ranger. (148 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Chrysler Imperial should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Chrysler Imperial weights approximately 972 kg more than 1995 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 Chrysler Imperial (470 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Ranger. (257 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 1956 Chrysler Imperial will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Chrysler Imperial | 1995 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Imperial | Ranger |
Year Released | 1956 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 2982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 470 Nm | 257 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2650 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2400 kg | 1428 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6170 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3800 mm | 2840 mm |