1956 Chrysler Imperial vs. 2000 Rover 75
To start off, 2000 Rover 75 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Chrysler Imperial. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Chrysler Imperial would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Chrysler Imperial is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Chrysler Imperial (247 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 2000 Rover 75. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Chrysler Imperial should accelerate faster than 2000 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Chrysler Imperial weights approximately 1010 kg more than 2000 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 Chrysler Imperial (470 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 309 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Rover 75. (161 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1956 Chrysler Imperial will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Chrysler Imperial | 2000 Rover 75 | |
Make | Chrysler | Rover |
Model | Imperial | 75 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 470 Nm | 161 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2400 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6170 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3800 mm | 2750 mm |