1956 Chrysler Imperial vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Chrysler Imperial. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Chrysler Imperial would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Chrysler Imperial is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (296 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1956 Chrysler Imperial. (247 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1956 Chrysler Imperial. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Chrysler Imperial weights approximately 738 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 Chrysler Imperial (470 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Mustang. (427 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1956 Chrysler Imperial will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Chrysler Imperial | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Imperial | Mustang |
Year Released | 1956 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 4606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 470 Nm | 427 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2400 kg | 1662 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6170 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3800 mm | 2620 mm |