1956 Chrysler Imperial vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Chrysler Imperial. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Chrysler Imperial would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Chrysler Imperial is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (305 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1956 Chrysler Imperial. (247 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1956 Chrysler Imperial. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 157 kg more than 1956 Chrysler Imperial. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 Chrysler Imperial (470 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Land Rover Range Rover. (440 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1956 Chrysler Imperial will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Chrysler Imperial | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
Model | Imperial | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1956 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 4394 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 470 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2400 kg | 2557 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6170 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3800 mm | 2750 mm |