1956 Chrysler Imperial vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Chrysler Imperial. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Chrysler Imperial would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Chrysler Imperial is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1956 Chrysler Imperial. (247 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1956 Chrysler Imperial. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Chrysler Imperial weights approximately 765 kg more than 2010 Cadillac BLS.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 Chrysler Imperial (470 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Cadillac BLS. (365 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1956 Chrysler Imperial will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Cadillac BLS.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Chrysler Imperial | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Chrysler | Cadillac |
Model | Imperial | BLS |
Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 470 Nm | 365 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2400 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6170 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3800 mm | 2680 mm |