1956 Chrysler Imperial vs. 2011 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Chrysler Imperial. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Chrysler Imperial would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Chrysler Imperial is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover (311 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1956 Chrysler Imperial. (247 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1956 Chrysler Imperial.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover (700 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Chrysler Imperial. (470 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2011 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Chrysler Imperial.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Chrysler Imperial | 2011 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
| Model | Imperial | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5423 cc | 4367 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 311 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 470 Nm | 700 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 6170 mm | 4973 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2035 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1877 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3800 mm | 2891 mm |
