1956 Chrysler New Yorker vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Chrysler New Yorker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Chrysler New Yorker would be higher. At 5,980 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 853 kg more than 1956 Chrysler New Yorker.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1956 Chrysler New Yorker has automatic transmission and 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL has manual transmission. 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1956 Chrysler New Yorker will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Chrysler New Yorker | 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | New Yorker | SL |
Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5802 cc | 5980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 605 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1977 kg | 2830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5610 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2570 mm |