1956 Citroen 11 vs. 1966 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1966 Mercury Cougar is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 4,728 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cougar (129 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1956 Citroen 11. (55 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1956 Citroen 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 242 kg more than 1956 Citroen 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Citroen 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Citroen 11 | 1966 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Citroen | Mercury |
| Model | 11 | Cougar |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1911 cc | 4728 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1362 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2830 mm |
