1956 Citroen 11 vs. 1996 Rover 220
To start off, 1996 Rover 220 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 220 (103 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1956 Citroen 11. (55 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 220 should accelerate faster than 1956 Citroen 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 220 weights approximately 19 kg more than 1956 Citroen 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Citroen 11 | 1996 Rover 220 | |
Make | Citroen | Rover |
Model | 11 | 220 |
Year Released | 1956 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1909 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1214 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2510 mm |