1956 Citroen 11 vs. 1997 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1997 Ford Mustang is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Mustang (590 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 535 more horse power than 1956 Citroen 11. (55 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1956 Citroen 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Citroen 11 weights approximately 265 kg more than 1997 Ford Mustang.
Because 1997 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Citroen 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Citroen 11 | 1997 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | 11 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1956 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1909 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 590 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2580 mm |