1956 Citroen 11 vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 1,911 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Citroen 11 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Citroen 11 (55 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Citroen 11 should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Citroen 11 weights approximately 470 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Citroen 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Citroen 11 | 1997 MCC Smart | |
Make | Citroen | MCC |
Model | 11 | Smart |
Year Released | 1956 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 53 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1460 mm |