1956 Citroen 11 vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1956 Citroen 11. (55 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1956 Citroen 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 47 kg more than 1956 Citroen 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Citroen 11 | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | 11 | 3 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1909 cc | 1998 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 145 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1242 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2650 mm |
