1956 Citroen 11 vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1956 Citroen 11. (55 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1956 Citroen 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Ranger weights approximately 469 kg more than 1956 Citroen 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Citroen 11. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Citroen 11 | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | 11 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1909 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1664 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5171 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1811 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 3198 mm |
