1956 Citroen 11 vs. 2010 Kia Forte
To start off, 2010 Kia Forte is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Forte is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Forte (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1956 Citroen 11. (55 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Forte should accelerate faster than 1956 Citroen 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Forte weights approximately 33 kg more than 1956 Citroen 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Citroen 11 | 2010 Kia Forte | |
Make | Citroen | Kia |
Model | 11 | Forte |
Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1909 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1228 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4529 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1775 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2649 mm |