1956 Citroen 2CV vs. 1950 Holden FX

To start off, 1956 Citroen 2CV is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Holden FX (51 HP) has 39 more horse power than 1956 Citroen 2CV. (12 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Holden FX should accelerate faster than 1956 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Holden FX weights approximately 370 kg more than 1956 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Citroen 2CV. (24 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1950 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Citroen 2CV.

Compare all specifications: