1956 Citroen 2CV vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1967 Riley Kestrel is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Riley Kestrel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Riley Kestrel (57 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1956 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Riley Kestrel should accelerate faster than 1956 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 420 kg more than 1956 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Riley Kestrel (94 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1967 Riley Kestrel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Citroen 2CV | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Citroen | Riley |
Model | 2CV | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1956 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 374 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 10 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 22 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 495 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2380 mm |