1956 Citroen 2CV vs. 1968 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1968 Ford Mustang is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 325 more horse power than 1956 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1956 Citroen 2CV.
Because 1968 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 575 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Citroen 2CV | 1968 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | 2CV | Mustang |
Year Released | 1956 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 374 cc | 7010 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 10 HP | 335 HP |
Torque | 22 Nm | 597 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 105 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 101.2 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2750 mm |