1956 Citroen 2CV vs. 1981 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 1981 Toyota Cressida is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Toyota Cressida is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Toyota Cressida weights approximately 665 kg more than 1956 Citroen 2CV.
Because 1981 Toyota Cressida is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Toyota Cressida. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Citroen 2CV | 1981 Toyota Cressida | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | 2CV | Cressida |
Year Released | 1956 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 374 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 10 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 89 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 495 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 70 L |