1956 Citroen 2CV vs. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover

To start off, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (222 HP) has 212 more horse power than 1956 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1956 Citroen 2CV.

Because 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 385 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm). This means 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Citroen 2CV. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1956 Citroen 2CV has manual transmission. 1956 Citroen 2CV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: