1956 Citroen 2CV vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1956 Citroen 2CV. (12 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1956 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Citroen 2CV weights approximately 160 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Citroen 2CV | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Citroen | Westfield |
| Model | 2CV | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 12 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2320 mm |
