1956 Citroen 2CV vs. 2004 Ford Ka

To start off, 2004 Ford Ka is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ka (94 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1956 Citroen 2CV. (12 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1956 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ka weights approximately 505 kg more than 1956 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Ka (135 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Citroen 2CV. (24 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Citroen 2CV.

Compare all specifications:

1956 Citroen 2CV 2004 Ford Ka
Make Citroen Ford
Model 2CV Ka
Year Released 1956 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 425 cc 1596 cc
Engine Cylinders 2 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type boxer in-line
Horse Power 12 HP 94 HP
Engine RPM 3500 RPM 5650 RPM
Torque 24 Nm 135 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4250 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 600 kg 1105 kg
Vehicle Length 3610 mm 3660 mm
Vehicle Width 1490 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1710 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2410 mm 2730 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 19 L 59 L