1956 Citroen 2CV vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 599 cc (3 cylinders), 2005 MCC Crossblade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1956 Citroen 2CV. (12 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1956 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 144 kg more than 1956 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Citroen 2CV. (24 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Citroen 2CV.

Compare all specifications: