1956 Citroen 2CV vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Citroen 2CV would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 495 more horse power than 1956 Citroen 2CV. (12 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1956 Citroen 2CV.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 606 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Citroen 2CV. (24 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Citroen 2CV. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS has automatic transmission and 1956 Citroen 2CV has manual transmission. 1956 Citroen 2CV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Citroen 2CV | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Citroen | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 2CV | CLS |
Year Released | 1956 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 12 HP | 507 HP |
Torque | 24 Nm | 630 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 80 L |