1956 Citroen 2CV vs. 2008 Mazda Rustler
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,586 cc, 2008 Mazda Rustler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda Rustler weights approximately 519 kg more than 1956 Citroen 2CV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda Rustler (120 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda Rustler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Citroen 2CV | 2008 Mazda Rustler | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | 2CV | Rustler |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 374 cc | 1586 cc |
| Horse Power | 10 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 22 Nm | 120 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 77 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 495 kg | 1014 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 54 L |
