1956 Citroen 2CV vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 99 more horse power than 1956 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1956 Citroen 2CV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Citroen 2CV | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | 2CV | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 374 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 10 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2490 mm |
