1956 Citroen 2CV vs. 2010 Holden Calais

To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 266 more horse power than 1956 Citroen 2CV. (12 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1956 Citroen 2CV.

Because 2010 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 326 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Citroen 2CV. (24 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Citroen 2CV. 2010 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 1956 Citroen 2CV has manual transmission. 1956 Citroen 2CV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: