1956 Citroen 2CV vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 1780 kg more than 1956 Citroen 2CV.
Because 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Citroen 2CV | 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
| Make | Citroen | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 2CV | ML |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 12 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 2380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1816 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2913 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 90 L |
