1956 Citroen DS vs. 1999 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Citroen DS would be higher. At 1,911 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Citroen DS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Citroen DS weights approximately 29 kg more than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Because 1999 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Citroen DS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Mustang (160 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Citroen DS. (137 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Citroen DS.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Citroen DS | 1999 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | DS | Mustang |
Year Released | 1956 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 1753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 160 Nm |
Top Speed | 142 km/hour | 321 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1237 kg | 1208 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 68 L |