1956 Citroen DS vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Citroen DS would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1956 Citroen DS. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1956 Citroen DS.
Because 2010 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Citroen DS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Ranger (322 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Citroen DS. (137 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Citroen DS.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Citroen DS | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | DS | Ranger |
Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1909 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 322 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 3193 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 74 L |