1956 Citroen ID 19 vs. 1947 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 1956 Citroen ID 19 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1947 Volvo PV 60 (85 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1956 Citroen ID 19. (66 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1947 Volvo PV 60 should accelerate faster than 1956 Citroen ID 19. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 396 kg more than 1956 Citroen ID 19. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1947 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Citroen ID 19, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Citroen ID 19 | 1947 Volvo PV 60 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | ID 19 | PV 60 |
Year Released | 1956 | 1947 |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 85 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1234 kg | 1630 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2850 mm |