1956 Citroen ID 19 vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 1974 Volvo 140 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Citroen ID 19. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Citroen ID 19 would be higher. At 1,911 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Citroen ID 19 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Volvo 140 (95 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1956 Citroen ID 19. (66 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Volvo 140 should accelerate faster than 1956 Citroen ID 19.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Citroen ID 19, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Volvo 140 (147 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Citroen ID 19. (133 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1974 Volvo 140 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Citroen ID 19.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Citroen ID 19 | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | ID 19 | 140 |
Year Released | 1956 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 95 HP |
Torque | 133 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 84.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 80 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2620 mm |