1956 Citroen ID 19 vs. 2002 Kia Optima
To start off, 2002 Kia Optima is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Citroen ID 19. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Citroen ID 19 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Kia Optima (138 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1956 Citroen ID 19. (66 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1956 Citroen ID 19. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Kia Optima weights approximately 198 kg more than 1956 Citroen ID 19. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Kia Optima (216 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Citroen ID 19. (133 Nm). This means 2002 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Citroen ID 19.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Citroen ID 19 | 2002 Kia Optima | |
Make | Citroen | Kia |
Model | ID 19 | Optima |
Year Released | 1956 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 133 Nm | 216 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1234 kg | 1432 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2710 mm |