1956 Daimler DK vs. 2000 Ford TS-50
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Daimler DK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Daimler DK would be higher. At 4,617 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Daimler DK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Daimler DK (168 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Daimler DK should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Daimler DK weights approximately 824 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Daimler DK (353 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 1956 Daimler DK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Daimler DK | 2000 Ford TS-50 | |
Make | Daimler | Ford |
Model | DK | TS-50 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4617 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 175 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2032 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 132 L |