1956 DKW F 93 vs. 2000 Ford TS-50

To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 DKW F 93. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 DKW F 93 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford TS-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TS-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1956 DKW F 93. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TS-50 should accelerate faster than 1956 DKW F 93. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TS-50 weights approximately 293 kg more than 1956 DKW F 93. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Ford TS-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TS-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 DKW F 93, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TS-50 (175 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 DKW F 93. (71 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TS-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 DKW F 93. 2000 Ford TS-50 has automatic transmission and 1956 DKW F 93 has manual transmission. 1956 DKW F 93 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford TS-50 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: