1956 DKW Munga vs. 1962 Dodge Polara
To start off, 1962 Dodge Polara is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 DKW Munga would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 264 more horse power than 1956 DKW Munga. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 1956 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Dodge Polara weights approximately 245 kg more than 1956 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Dodge Polara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 DKW Munga | 1962 Dodge Polara | |
| Make | DKW | Dodge |
| Model | Munga | Polara |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 896 cc | 5905 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1525 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2960 mm |
