1956 DKW Munga vs. 1982 Ford Laser
To start off, 1982 Ford Laser is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Ford Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Laser (85 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1956 DKW Munga. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Laser should accelerate faster than 1956 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 DKW Munga weights approximately 490 kg more than 1982 Ford Laser.
Because 1956 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Ford Laser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Laser (120 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 DKW Munga. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Ford Laser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 DKW Munga | 1982 Ford Laser | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | Laser |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 896 cc | 1489 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 120 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2370 mm |
