1956 DKW Munga vs. 1982 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1982 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1956 DKW Munga. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1956 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 DKW Munga weights approximately 190 kg more than 1982 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1956 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mazda Cosmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Mazda Cosmo (149 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 DKW Munga. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 DKW Munga | 1982 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | DKW | Mazda |
| Model | Munga | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 896 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 149 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2620 mm |
