1956 DKW Munga vs. 1997 Ford Ka
To start off, 1997 Ford Ka is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Ka (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1956 DKW Munga. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1956 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 DKW Munga weights approximately 400 kg more than 1997 Ford Ka.
Because 1956 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Ka (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 DKW Munga. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1997 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
1956 DKW Munga | 1997 Ford Ka | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | Munga | Ka |
Year Released | 1956 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 896 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2460 mm |