1956 DKW Munga vs. 2000 Volvo V40
To start off, 2000 Volvo V40 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Volvo V40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo V40 (108 HP) has 71 more horse power than 1956 DKW Munga. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo V40 should accelerate faster than 1956 DKW Munga.
Because 1956 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Volvo V40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volvo V40 (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 DKW Munga. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Volvo V40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 DKW Munga | 2000 Volvo V40 | |
| Make | DKW | Volvo |
| Model | Munga | V40 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 896 cc | 1587 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2570 mm |
