1956 DKW Munga vs. 2003 Ford Lynx
To start off, 2003 Ford Lynx is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Lynx (108 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1956 DKW Munga. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Lynx should accelerate faster than 1956 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 DKW Munga weights approximately 170 kg more than 2003 Ford Lynx.
Because 1956 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Lynx. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Lynx (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 DKW Munga. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Lynx will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
1956 DKW Munga | 2003 Ford Lynx | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | Munga | Lynx |
Year Released | 1956 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 896 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2620 mm |