1956 DKW Munga vs. 2004 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2004 Honda CR-V is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Honda CR-V (160 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1956 DKW Munga. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1956 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Honda CR-V weights approximately 238 kg more than 1956 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Honda CR-V (220 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 DKW Munga. (71 Nm). This means 2004 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
1956 DKW Munga | 2004 Honda CR-V | |
Make | DKW | Honda |
Model | Munga | CR-V |
Year Released | 1956 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 896 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 220 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1518 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2630 mm |