1956 DKW Munga vs. 2006 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2006 Ford Falcon is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Falcon (200 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1956 DKW Munga. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1956 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Falcon weights approximately 301 kg more than 1956 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 286 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 DKW Munga. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 DKW Munga | 2006 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 896 cc | 3984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 357 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1581 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2930 mm |
