1956 DKW Munga vs. 2006 Mazda B2300
To start off, 2006 Mazda B2300 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2006 Mazda B2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda B2300 (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1956 DKW Munga. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 1956 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda B2300 weights approximately 78 kg more than 1956 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda B2300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda B2300 (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 DKW Munga. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda B2300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 DKW Munga | 2006 Mazda B2300 | |
| Make | DKW | Mazda |
| Model | Munga | B2300 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 896 cc | 2260 cc |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 209 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1358 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2840 mm |
